<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men&#8217;s voices harder to understand for speech recognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/</link>
	<description>an RSI sufferer&#039;s thoughts and wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanf</title>
		<link>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-6206</link>
		<dc:creator>alanf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/?p=753#comment-6206</guid>
		<description>Hi Adrian,

You are partly correct, my encounter with speech recognition was 4 years ago now and I expect the software has perhaps improved a bit by now. However the reserach quoted in the article about male voices being harder to recognise was from a March 2010 article quoting presumably recent research done by Edinburgh University, so I&#039;d say that whatever they found isn&#039;t &#039;dated&#039; unless of course they are using outdated software too!

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adrian,</p>
<p>You are partly correct, my encounter with speech recognition was 4 years ago now and I expect the software has perhaps improved a bit by now. However the reserach quoted in the article about male voices being harder to recognise was from a March 2010 article quoting presumably recent research done by Edinburgh University, so I&#8217;d say that whatever they found isn&#8217;t &#8216;dated&#8217; unless of course they are using outdated software too!</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-6205</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/?p=753#comment-6205</guid>
		<description>Hi.  I read your article with interest, but would, respectfully, point out that it sounds rather dated.  For a start, Dragon Naturally Speaking 10.1 - the latest version - is remarkably quick to learn your accent and for general use does not require much training at all; it can be honed for dialects; is remarkably accurate.  So, I really suggest you get the latest version of this software.  I think you will be surprised to see how far it has advanced since your, apparently, first use of it. 
Best wishes, 
Adrian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I read your article with interest, but would, respectfully, point out that it sounds rather dated.  For a start, Dragon Naturally Speaking 10.1 &#8211; the latest version &#8211; is remarkably quick to learn your accent and for general use does not require much training at all; it can be honed for dialects; is remarkably accurate.  So, I really suggest you get the latest version of this software.  I think you will be surprised to see how far it has advanced since your, apparently, first use of it.<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

