<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ergomatters RSI Blog &#187; speech recognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/tag/speech-recognition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>an RSI sufferer&#039;s thoughts and wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Men&#8217;s voices harder to understand for speech recognition</title>
		<link>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alanf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech recognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a BBC news story recently titled &#8220;Computers find male voices &#8216;harder to recognise&#8217;&#8221; describes how Edinburgh University scientists found that computer speech recognition software finds male voices harder to understand than female voices. This they attribute to the fact that men &#8220;make &#8216;umm&#8217; and &#8216;err&#8217; sounds more frequently.&#8221; I can attest to this. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a BBC news story recently titled &#8220;<a title="Computers find male voices 'harder to recognise' " href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/8548131.stm" target="_blank">Computers find male voices &#8216;harder to recognise&#8217;</a>&#8221; describes how Edinburgh University scientists found that computer speech recognition software finds male voices harder to understand than female voices.</p>
<p>This they attribute to the fact that men &#8220;make &#8216;umm&#8217; and &#8216;err&#8217; sounds more frequently.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can attest to this. It is a common problem in general, and I was guilty of doing this in presentations in between lines as I paused to catch a breath. It&#8217;s also common when pausing between words when using voice recognition. A bad habit? Perhaps, but a common habit nonetheless.</p>
<p>In addition, the scientists found that, &#8220;Variations in pitch, tone and speed can also cause the system to  misunderstand voices&#8221; &#8211; which goes without saying. No two people talk in the same way or style. If we did, we&#8217;d be a very boring species! Dialects and regional variations also come into play, and as such I can certainly see why speech recognition software has its work cut out to achieve results.</p>
<p>My own experience with trying out speech recognition wasn&#8217;t great. I think my low toned Scottish accent with plentiful doses of &#8216;umm&#8217; and &#8216;err&#8217; didn&#8217;t help either, but I did feel a bit aggrieved at its inability to learn my accent. It was some time ago so the software may well have changed and improved a lot since then, but I remember feeling frustrated at the many hours I had sunk into the system hoping it would learn my voice, all for naught in the end. Voice recognition in my mind has always had great potential for relief of over-used arm and  hand muscles, but  the effort involved in learning how to use the  software, ie teaching  the software to recognise your voice, for was a soul  destroying and futile task!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad but true fact that for me there really is no comparable alternative to the keyboard in this day and age!</p>
<p>Rate this post! Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ergomatters.co.uk/blog/input-devices/mens-voices-speech-recognition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

